Why Greenpeace needs to go away

"The giveaways and preferences in the bill will actually spur a new generation of nuclear and coal-fired power plants to the detriment of real energy solutions."

How the hell does Greenpeace seriously put coal and nuclear in the same boat? Nuclear provides 70% of our CO2 free energy, and that is without building a plant in 30 years. Yet Greenpeace seems to think that it and coal are just the same thing.

What the hell do you want Greenpeace? You don't even know anymore do you? You wanted to saved the whales, they are basically saved (the Japanese never got the memo it seems). You wanted to save the ozone, is seems to be doing pretty well. Now, you want "real energy solutions" but you dont want the one energy solution which can actually provide real energy.

Your policies are based on idiocy, emotion, and anti-homo sapienism, they are not even based on actual environmental benefit anymore.

Go away. Go back to your yurts, tents, caves and recycled post-consumer cardboard hovels.

Comments

  1. Greenpeace sailing all over the world in their desiil powered ships RAIN WARIOR II and ARCTIC SUNRISE to luanch their gasoline powered zodiacs and make total pests of themselves and yammering their silly heads of about Global Warming/Climate Change witha big plastic or fiberglass polarbear

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Ways to Not Suck at Driving