Why I hate Pelosi, and politicians in general

From an article on Nancy Pelosi and Senate travel costs:

"It's long been apparent that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has a "plane thing." After the Democrats took control of Congress in 2006, Ms. Pelosi had a little dust-up with the Bush Administration over her request to use the military version of a Boeing 757 for official travel.

Earlier this year, the speaker had another hissy fit because her new, preferred mode of transportation (a Gulfstream G5) wasn't available. Judicial Watch obtained copies of memos from senior Congressional staffers, demanding answers from the Air Force (which handles most VIP airflift missions for DoD), and suggesting there might be hell to pay because a requested aircraft type was already booked.

"It is my understanding there are no G5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable...The speaker will want to know where the planes are..." wrote Kay King, Director of the House Office of Interparliamentary Affairs. In a separate email, when told a certain type of aircraft would not be available, King writes, "This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset [s]peaker."

Supporters of Ms. Pelosi note that her predecessor, Illinois Republican Dennis Hastert, also traveled on a private jet. But Mr. Hastert didn't began using military aircraft for routine travel until after 9-11, and there is no record of him constantly badgering the Air Force for use of executive jets. Records provided to Judicial Watch indicate that Ms. Pelosi's office typically "booked" a G5 every weekend, but often cancelled at the last moment. There is no indication of how much money was wasted on prepping aircraft that were never used.

Such revelations became a p.r. nightmare for the speaker, but Ms Pelosi and her fellow Congressmen don't care. Earlier this week, they added another $250 million to a defense appropriations bill to buy two additional G5s and two more Boeing 737 business jets. The Pentagon had only requested a single G550 and one 737, in addition to the purchase of two Boeing business jets that are currently being leased.

In other words, Congress wants four more top-of-line executive aircraft and by all indications, the lawmakers will get them. We haven't heard a peep out of GOP lawmakers (who also enjoy access to the aircraft), or President Obama. This from the same Republicans who complain about runaway government spending--and a Commander-in-Chief who threatened to veto the defense bill if it contained more money for the F-22 Raptor. As always, hypocrisy is one of the few genuinely bipartisan issues in Washington."

Why are they spending MORE than the Air Force asked for, when the Air Force needs things like.. oh I don't know.. more fighters to replace the 40 year old ones they are flying? Ok, 40 is a bit of a stretch, but somehow I think the USAF and the US general population would be a lot better served by more F-22's than more G5's for Pelosi's vacations...

Also - how is there not a huge scandal over this? In the UK there was a scandal over costs for MP's that was a fraction of the totals discussed here. And in that case, it nearly brought down the government (a PM can lose his post if he looses the support of his party, even between elections - he is the Prime Minister, not the President, and thus part of the legislature). Good 'ol Gordon almost got the sack because his party spent some money on 2nd home repairs, but California Nancy doesn't take flak for her G5 addiction? Ridiculous.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This is just disgusting....

Top 10 Ways to Not Suck at Driving