Virus as Vaccine / Involuntary Vaccine

By -

What if we had released a mild but highly infectious version of Covid-19 into the wild in Sept 2020 rather than the vaccine? 

This is not SciFi, it is entirely possible.

Under Western ethical standards of "Do No Harm" this is totally unethical. Under Chinese standards of "Greatest Common Good" or "Greatest Communist Good" this could an arguably should have been done. 

Think through the implications. If we had engineered something like Omicron but milder (let's call it Omega) and released it into the wild in Sept 2020 - what would have happened? A huge number of people would have had a cold, and lived. A small number of people would likely still have died (making it impossible to do this under "Do No Harm") but compared to the number of people who instead died from Covid 'naturally' the outcome could have been far better - potentially millions of people and trillions of dollars better. 

Who gets to make that decision? Certainly no one in the Western world. I am surprised China did not try the approach however. 

Effectively, it creates an involuntary vaccine - one with no logistics challenges, expense, distribution, issues of access, issues of willingness to take the vaccine. It would have been highly effective. Paired with the actual vaccine itself, it could have stopped Covid 2 years before it will naturally fade (around the end of 2022 hopefully). 

Could we have done it? Yes. Should we have done it? Greatest Common Good has all kinds of problems attached to it - hence our "Do No Harm" standard. There are logical boundaries though, what if Covid killed 10% of infected people? 10% of children? When do you deploy an involuntary vaccine?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Ways to Not Suck at Driving

By -
Image
There are a lot of shitty drivers out there. Actually, most people are shitty drivers. They don't really know anything about cars, about driving, about limits of adhesion, how to react when things go badly, or what snow does to your ability to drive. In fact, most people think that driving slowly, regardless of what lane you are in, whether you are merging onto a highway or holding up 50 cars behind you, means "being a good driver." Just because you have spent many years driving in the left lane at 65mph does not make you a good driver, in fact, just the opposite. A good driver means you know how to drive, not that you have gotten lucky or simply average for the past 10 years. Personally, I would love to see a class in high school devoted to driving. I think it could be fun and informative while greatly reducing the number of accidents (especially fatal ones) on the roads every year. Right now, the driving exam is basically a joke, it means that you know what the pedals
Read more

78% Of Prius owners trade it in... for something else

By -
Image
Turns out most people don't think looking green is worth the sacrifice of owning a shitty, expensive car. Only 1/3rd of hybrid owners buy another one. Please, no more, I can't take it anymore Good news for the electric revolution? Not really. As I have been saying for years - the Prius has absolutely no logical economic value. There are other cars which are cheaper, better, and with similar fuel economy, or at least with good enough fuel economy that the price premium for the prius makes no damn sense. And the numbers show that: hybrid loyalty has fluctuated very little over the last 6 years, while gas prices have moved all over the place. In other words - buying a hybrid has nothing to do with logic. Shocking.
Read more