PC World is written by dumb dumbs

I used to like PC World, back when I was checking out the latest GeForce2 card, 256mb of RAM gaming machine with a screaming 800mhz pentium 3. Those were the days...

Sadly, PC World is now written seemingly by undergrads with a major in dumbass and a minor in Apple fanboy.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/200298/iphone_4_battery_life_the_test_results_are_in.html

They tested the new iPhone 4 against the old 3GS and found the 4 had better battery life. Ok... but how did they do the test?

"To get an idea of how the iPhone 4's battery life compares to its predecessor in varied use, I borrowed a colleague's year old 32GB iPhone 3GS and tested it and the iPhone 4 using a series of different tasks. The results show that the iPhone 4 does indeed last an appreciably longer time."

WOW

I mean

WOW

Really? A phone that has been used for a year solidly by some tech junkie type has less battery life than a new phone? Ohmygodholdthephonethisisthemostamazingthingapplehaseverdoneincredible

The world is a little inverted these days. Engadget, a blog, provides the best news and reviews, while CNET and PC World - especially PC World - put out junk like this and call it testing. Idiotic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Doomsday Bunkers for What? "Preppers" Are Idiots

Top 10 Ways to Not Suck at Driving